this is sort of a follow-on question from the this question, and after reading this set of guidelines, I'm still not entirely sure I'm in the right place or asking the right question. Still, nothing ventured...

I'm currently trying to find a particular methodology with which I can texture the environments in a computer game (stay with me here!). I'm drawn to the clean, low-frequency detailing from a game published in 1995, Delphine's Fade to Black (have skipped to the start of the game here). On the PC this mixed gourad-shaded polygons for objects and characters with stark, low-resolution textures for most of the game.

I've always been attracted to low-poly art in CG, and precisionist art in traditional mediums, as seen in the following examples...enter image description here

Note - hard shadows, distinct blocks of colour with gradients. There are a few games which have borrowed from this style - Ico, Team Fortress 2, Rime (among others) and I think it might work for the game I currently have in mind.

That said - the Fade to Black wall texturing seems to my eyes (despite being a low-res texture map) a little more impressionistic/abstract than Sheeler, Smart et al. Details and folds are hinted at with a simple block of dark green, rust is implied with a couple dabs of brown. In fact, there's a touch of the screaming pope to it, to my eyes...Francis Bacon, Screaming Pope Obviously Bacon's work is wayy more detailed and frantic, but I can't help but think that the impressionistic, low frequency detail of the Fade To Black environment texturing has more in common with Bacon than the totally cool, remote Sheeler.

So my question is: Does anybody know of a particular style of art which combines precisionism with elements of impressionism, daubs of paint, implying detail etc.? Does anybody have any examples of this that I could investigate?

In truth, I'm a bit of a traditional art ignoramus, but I think this might be useful research for my project.

Tip of the hat to Catija for advice, hope this isn't too far off into the weeds.

Thanks in advance. =)


PS: Sorry that the question rambles, I'm having a little trouble forming my thoughts on this.


What you're talking about isn't just one style or school, but it sounds like you may like works coming from: scuola metafisica, surrealism, American modernism, American realism, expressionism, and symbolism.

Now, as I said, the characteristics you described don't define any school of fine art in particular, so within those schools there will be works that do and don't fit what you're looking for.

Definitely check out Egon Schiele and Giorgio de Chirico.

|improve this answer|||||
  • I appreciate your efforts here - the request was rather inarticulate and vague! I'll keep my eyes on scuola metafisica and American realism - thank you for the reference! I dig Egon Schiele & Giorgio de Chirico, appreciate you mentioning them. =) Will mark this the best answer, as you've identified a lot of leads...! – Reverend Speed Jun 20 '17 at 12:35

Interesting question. As Wiljago has commented De Chirico is a good fit however I'll add that what unites the examples you've given are not stylistic (formal) similarities but atmospheric.

Your examples do mainly feature the flat clean (low poly)geometric forms or surfaces you favour but other factors are far more emotionally evocative. Open, empty public spaces, decaying grandeur, isolated figures in stark urban environments all bathed in low raking evening light (long defined shadows). Francis Bacon is notable because while he recognised and strove for a starkness in his work, he also wanted to subvert it with increasingly random marks and splatters.

Given that you are working towards an art style for a game I'd suggest you also check out the architect Louis Kahn whose clean minimal grandeur might tie in nicely with the mood you're after. If you address nothing else but the evening lighting (notably absent from "Fade to Black") however I think you will achieve the atmosphere that unites your sources.

|improve this answer|||||
  • Sorry, just saw I had a response to this! This is an EXCELLENT analysis of my gibberish question and Louis Kahn is a great reference. Thank you, you've definitely helped me think about my search in a clearer, more descriptive way. – Reverend Speed Jul 31 '17 at 22:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.